The World Health Organization (WHO) is trying to change some important international health rules. These rules are called the International Health Regulations, or IHR for short. They tell countries what to do during big health emergencies like pandemics. In 2022 and 2024, the WHO made changes to these rules. But here's the problem: they didn't follow their own rulebook when making these changes. It's like changing the rules of a game while you're playing without telling everyone first. That's not fair, and it's not legal.

How Did They Break the Rules?

When the WHO wants to change their health rules, they have to follow certain steps. These steps are written in their own rulebook. Here's what went wrong:

For the 2022 changes, they needed to have enough countries present at the meeting where they voted. We have videos showing that not enough countries were there. It's like having a class vote when half the students are absent. For the 2024 changes, they were supposed to send out the new rules to all countries at least four months before voting on them. Instead, they only sent them three months before. This meant countries didn't have enough time to study the changes.

The Vice President of Costa Rica even wrote a letter saying countries just "agreed" to the changes without following the proper steps. This proves they knew they were skipping important rules.

Why These New Rules Are Concerning

If these new rules go into effect, they would change a lot about how health emergencies are handled. Here are some of the biggest concerns:

New Powers Over Medical Treatments

The new rules would give the WHO the power to tell countries they must use certain medical products during emergencies. This includes newer technologies like mRNA vaccines. Countries wouldn't be able to decide for themselves what treatments are best for their people. The rules specifically say countries must "prioritize mRNA" technologies. This means one specific type of medical technology would be favored over others, even if countries prefer different options.

Health Surveillance Powers

The new rules would create a system where more of your health information could be collected and shared internationally. This includes your genetic information.

They also create a framework for "digital health certificates" - systems that could track who has received certain medical treatments and limit travel for those who haven't.

Turning Recommendations into Commands

Before, when the WHO made "recommendations," countries could decide whether to follow them. The new rules change the word "should" to "shall" in many places. This turns suggestions into commands. For example, one new rule says countries "shall implement temporary recommendations within 48 hours." This means countries would have to do whatever the WHO recommends, even if their own health experts disagree.

Controls on Information

The new rules include something called "infodemic management." This means controlling what information people can share about health topics. The WHO would help decide what counts as "misinformation" that should be removed from websites and social media.

Our Plan to Challenge These Illegal Changes

Our organization, Interest of Justice, is fighting back. We have a special status as a recognized "stakeholder" in these discussions, which gives us the right to raise concerns.

On April 5, 2025, we sent a formal legal notice to all 194 WHO member countries. This notice explains exactly how the rules were broken and asks countries to acknowledge that the changes aren't legally valid.

Here's our step-by-step plan:

Step 1: The Formal Dispute Process

We've started something called the "Article 56 dispute resolution process." This is like raising your hand in class to point out that rules aren't being followed. We've given countries 30 days to show evidence that they actually followed the proper procedures. If they can't show this evidence (and we know they can't because we have proof they didn't), then countries should declare the changes invalid.

Step 2: Legal Challenge in Costa Rica

We're preparing to file a legal case in Costa Rica's courts. Costa Rica has strong laws about following proper procedures for international agreements.

We'll ask Costa Rica's courts to declare that the changes to the health rules can't be enforced in Costa Rica because the proper steps weren't followed when making them.

If we win in Costa Rica, other countries might follow their example and we would PROVE the nullity to force them to nullify.

Step 3: Building a Movement in Multiple Countries

We plan to take similar legal action in other countries like South Africa and India, which have courts that care deeply about following proper procedures.

We'll work with lawmakers in different countries to question why these important changes were rushed through without following the rules.

What's at Stake?

These rule changes would affect everyone on the planet. They would change how health emergencies are managed and limit what choices individual countries can make about protecting their people.

The new rules would:

Allow the WHO to declare emergencies more easily

Force countries to use specific medical technologies like mRNA

Create systems to collect more of your health data

Control what information you can access about health topics

Bypass your country's usual decision-making processes during emergencies

How You Can Help?

Sign and share this demand far and wide

Educate everyone who may care about the issues and encourage them to become involved

IoJ needs resources to fight this legal battle. Unlike the big organizations pushing these changes, we rely on support from ordinary people who care about following proper rules

and protecting their country's right to make its own health decisions.

Here's what your support can do:

$100 helps us translate important legal documents for courts in different countries

$250 helps us get expert statements from international law specialists

$500 helps us analyze video evidence of the meetings where rules were broken

$1,000 helps us file legal papers in one country's courts

$5,000 helps us secure legal representation for a full court case

Why This Matters Now

The window to challenge these changes is closing quickly. We need to act now before countries start implementing these new rules.

"This isn't just about technical rules being broken," says Dustin Bryce, our director.

"It's about making sure big changes to international health rules happen the right way, with proper time for all countries to review and understand what they're agreeing to."

Our fight isn't about politics—it's about proper procedures and protecting each country's right to make health decisions for its own citizens. With your help, we can ensure that international rules are made fairly and legally.

Interest of Justice is an International Civil Society Organization officially recognized as stakeholders by the World Health Organization in matters related to Pandemic Preparedness and Response, as well as the International Health Regulations amendment process.

HOW MUCH WILL THIS FIGHT COST?

Estimated Resource Requirements For Strategic Financial Plan

This unprecedented legal challenge obviously requires precisely calculated resources to counter the immense globalist and institutional forces supporting these IHR amendments:

Estimated Legal Intervention Budget Requirements

• Component Technical Requirements Tactical Application Estimated Cost (USD) Article 56 Dispute Resolution Legal representation, forensic documentation Direct challenge through IHR mechanisms $75,000-125,000 
• Costa Rican Constitutional Challenge Local counsel, expert witnesses Judicial precedent creation $60,000-85,000 
• Multi-Jurisdictional Matrix Implementation Jurisdiction-specific counsel Strategic litigation cascade $90,000-150,000 
• Documentary Evidence Repository Forensic analysis, certified translations Evidentiary foundation $40,000-65,000 
• Expert Affidavits and Technical Opinions International law scholars Authoritative support $35,000-50,000 
• Parliamentary Engagement Technical briefings, model resolutions Legislative resistance $30,000-45,000

Estimated Total Core Legal Budget $330,000-520,000.

We are very resourceful and may be able to save money off the estimated budget, but let's all face facts, the fight will not be cheap to hire the very best lawyers to fight against ALL COUNTRIES AND WHO in court.

This is so important, we can NOT fail or let them get away with this. It’s how the next attack would be fomented!

Thank you all for sharing, caring, supporting, commenting, learning, and TAKING ACTION! - 

Love IoJ - God hired us, who's going to fire us? We shall prevail victorious, because humanity is WORTH fighting for!